> > Intex IN 6611 Ace vs. Micromax Q3 ezpad

Compare Intex IN 6611 Ace vs. Micromax Q3 ezpad

Intex IN 6611 Ace
 		VS
Micromax Q3 ezpad
VS
Best Price
Price Not Available Not Available
Battery
Capacity 1450 mAH, Li-ion

45.0% more mAH battery than Micromax Q3 ezpad. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (1450 mAH, Li-ion vs. 1000 mAH, Li-ion)

 1000 mAH, Li-ion
TalkTime Up to 10.2 Hours(2G) Up to 4 Hours(2G)
Stand By Time Up to 4 Hours(2G)
Camera
Camera Features Effects, Multi Shot
Main Camera 1.3 MP 1.3 MP
Video Recording Recording Formats: MPEG-4, 3GP, AVI
Zoom Digital Zoom Digital Zoom
Connectivity
GPRS Yes Class 10, 32 - 48 kbps kbps
EDGE No No
USB Connectivity No USB Port
Design
Weight 128 grams 97 grams

31.0 grams Lighter than Micromax Q3 ezpad. light weight phone is easy to hold and can kept in your pocket for long time. (97 grams vs. 128 grams)
Dimensions 115 x 60 x 12 mm

1.0 mm Thinner than Micromax Q3 ezpad. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (115 x 60 x 12 mm vs. 111.2 x 61.2 x 13 mm)

 111.2 x 61.2 x 13 mm
Screen Size 2.2 Inch 2.2 Inch
Colours Black Black
Display
Screen Resolution 176 x 220 pixels
Pixel Density (sharpness) 128 ppi
Display Type LCD LCD
Features
Box Contents Handset, Charger, Battery, Earphone, Warranty Card, User Guide, USB Cable Transceiver, Standard Charger, Standard Battery, Handsfree Kit, Leather Pouch, Service Guide, User Guide, Warranty Card
General
Brand Intex Micromax
Model IN 6611 ACE Q3 ezpad
SIM Slot(s) Dual SIM, GSM+GSM Dual SIM, GSM+GSM
Multimedia
FM Radio Scheduled FM Recording Stereo FM, Recording option
Storage
Expandable Memory Up to 4 GB Up to 2 GB
Internal Memory 10 MB
Price Comparison

Compare Price

Compare Price

Others Related Comparisons