16.7% more mAH battery than Micromax X265. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (1400 mAH, Li-ion vs. 1200 mAH, Li-ion)
1.2 mm Thinner than Micromax X265. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (123 x 52.8 x 13.50 mm vs. 113.7 x 50 x 14.70 mm)
9.1% bigger screen size than Micromax X265. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (2.4 Inch vs. 2.2 Inch)
9.4% Higher pixel density than Micromax X265. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (128 ppi vs. 117 ppi)
Compare Price