> > Samsung C260 vs. Micromax Q3 ezpad

Compare Samsung C260 vs. Micromax Q3 ezpad

Samsung C260
 		VS
Micromax Q3 ezpad
VS
Best Price
Price Not Available Not Available
Battery
TalkTime Up to 7 Hours(2G) Up to 4 Hours(2G)
Stand By Time Up to 168 Hours(2G) Up to 4 Hours(2G)
Capacity 1000 mAH, Li-ion
Camera
Zoom Digital Zoom
Camera Features Effects, Multi Shot
Main Camera No 1.3 MP
Connectivity
GPRS Class 10, 32 - 48 kbps kbps Class 10, 32 - 48 kbps kbps
EDGE No No
Bluetooth No
USB Connectivity No USB Port
Design
Weight 74 grams

23.0 grams Lighter than Micromax Q3 ezpad. light weight phone is easy to hold and can kept in your pocket for long time. (74 grams vs. 97 grams)

 97 grams
Dimensions 88 x 45 x 19.80 mm 111.2 x 61.2 x 13 mm

6.8 mm Thinner than Micromax Q3 ezpad. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (111.2 x 61.2 x 13 mm vs. 88 x 45 x 19.80 mm)
Screen Size 2.2 Inch
Colours Black
Display
Pixel Density (sharpness) 128 ppi
Display Type LCD
Screen Resolution 128 x 128 pixels , 1.5 inches pixels 176 x 220 pixels
Features
Box Contents Transceiver, Standard Charger, Standard Battery, Handsfree Kit, Leather Pouch, Service Guide, User Guide, Warranty Card
General
Brand Samsung Micromax
Model C260 Q3 ezpad
SIM Slot(s) Single SIM, GSM Dual SIM, GSM+GSM
Multimedia
FM Radio Stereo FM, Recording option
Storage
Internal Memory 600 KB 10 MB
Expandable Memory No Up to 2 GB
Price Comparison

Compare Price

Compare Price